Sitemap - 2021 - 文社 Humanities and Social Sciences
欧盟印太战略弱点，东欧缘何亲美疏华？The weakness of EU's Indo-Pacific strategy
逐鹿南洋：美中在东南亚的战略竞争 The Sino-American Strategic Competition in Southeast Asia
坎贝尔：美国不会退出印太，美国没有衰落Campbell: The US will not leave Indo-Pacific, America is not declining
（线上讨论）“一带一路” vs. “印太战略”： 地缘经济和地缘政治的较量？
（视频）坎贝尔：美将建立印太经济框架 Campbell: The US will establish an Indo-Pacific economic framework
“一带一路” vs. “印太战略”： 地缘经济和地缘政治的较量
德国名教授：中欧不能“脱钩”，但是必须“对等” Tanja Börzel: For China-EU relations, it is not decoupling, but reciprocity
AUKUS: Chinese Miscalculation? Inevitable Competition? 澳英美联盟：中国误判所致？不可避免的竞争？
"Indo-Pacific Strategy" vs. "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere"
Online discussion: Will digital powers reshape the global order?
（播客）经济转型：中国“渐进改革” vs. 俄国“休克疗法”
在线讨论 | 经济转型：中国“渐进式改革” vs. 俄罗斯“休克疗法”
Sandschneider: The China policies of EU and Germany must be multidimensional
Discussion with Prof. Eberhard Sandschneider: EU-China relations after sanctions on each other
（讨论邀请）新“大博弈”：美日澳印四国同盟（Quad）vs. 中俄伊（朗）？
Geopolitics, International political economy and German-Chinese exchanges. 地缘政治、国际政治经济学和中国德国交流。
61. 评中美阿拉斯加高层会谈-2：中国价值就是人类价值，意识形态对抗初露峥嵘？
60. 评中美阿拉斯加高层会谈-1：外交全面战狼化？还是在下一盘大棋？
58. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken: A Foreign Policy for the American People
53. 德国CDU新党魁：平庸政客（Laschet）战胜政商精英（Merz）和外交俊杰（Röttgen）的台前幕后及回顾展望
52. China vs. Germany: Different attitudes toward digitalisation